Why should I be surprised, really?  Isn’t it just the norm to have a look at teen literature that is shallow, dismissive and uninformed?  This time it is the Wall Street Journal that has an article like this.  The title alone should have warned me away:  It Was, Like, All Dark and Stormy.

The author of the article, Katie Roiphe, manages to minimize The Hunger Games, Thirteen Reasons Why, Wintergirls, and If I Stay in a single article.  Quite the accomplishment!  All of them are lumped together into proof that the pink and purple world of teen books (when was that?!) has morphed into a frightening rollercoaster ride straight to doom. 

She shows a remarkable confusion about why teens read darker fiction:

Unsettling as it is, there is a certain amount of comfort to be gleaned from the new disaster fiction; it makes its readers feel less alone. What is striking in the response to these books is how many teenagers seem to identify with their characters, even though their experiences (suicide, car crashes, starvation, murder) would seem to place them on the outer fringes of normal life.

The one redeeming feature is that by the end of the article she seems to start to get it.  She calls these books “more uplifting” than light teen books.  And she concludes her article with:

As alarming as these books are, there is in all of this bleakness a wholesome and old-fashioned redemption that involves principles like triumph over adversity and affirmations of integrity.

Too bad she didn’t go back and use that insight to fix the beginning of the article!